Inside Elections

Entries tagged as ‘Election costs’

Wake Up Sacramento!

June 5, 2009 · 5 Comments

 The MAJORITY of voters who participate in elections in California do so by MAIL. The evidence continues to grow.  

In Picture 013the June 2 Redwood City Elementary School District Election, 68% of the voters voted by mail. In the May 19 Consolidated Special Statewide Election, 64.8% of the voters voted by mail.

In California, 64.5% of the voters cast their ballot by mail in the May 19th special election.

It’s time for change. Registrars should be given the flexibility to conduct elections by mail if their local Board of Supervisors approves the approach.

San Mateo County would save about 30% in election costs. And elections are costly to conduct. At a time when the state is slashing programs, shutting parks and according to the Controller, will be out of money by July 29, this idea is a no-brainer.

Let counties save real money by choosing opting to conduct elections by mail – as long as the locals support it.

Categories: Elections Office · Vote By Mail · legislation
Tagged:

Conduct California’s “Budget Fix” Special Election by Mail

February 9, 2009 · 1 Comment

The article below is an opinion-editorial piece written by Warren Slocum, as submitted to the Sacramento Bee.

As the budget impasse now reaches the 100 day mark, the word is that California will have a special election in May or June. While the exact date of that “budget fix” election is not known at this time, there is one thing we know for certain. If that election is conducted by mail it would save taxpayers big bucks.

No matter what ends up on the ballot, the election will carry a healthy price tag for county governments. And it comes exactly at a time when they can least afford it. While the state has said they will repay counties for the costs of the special election, Registrars of Voters are not holding their collective breath. Who knows when “the check will be in the mail?”

(more…)

Categories: Campaigns/Political parties · Elections Office · Outreach · Vote By Mail · Voting · legislation
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Local Voter Guide separate from SOS Guide – Getting it out to late registrants reimburseable

December 8, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Voters who registered to vote after the E – 60 mark (60 days prior to the election) received a state voter information guide much later than voters who were already on the rolls.   Why?

The California Secretary of State’s office sends a separate voter information guide from the County. Typically, County guides (which we call Sample Ballot & Official Voter Information Pamphlet) contain more local information, such as local measures and candidates.  We tailor it specifically for the voters of the County.

The state guide includes statewide propositions, state or federal candidates, and other more general information that pertains to all voters within California.

They send it out pretty early — it usually starts arriving in boxes about 1 1/2 to 2 months prior to an election.  Because of this, the State relies on the Counties to send out a supplemental mailing to voters who register after the original mailing was sent.

We had a huge influx of registration, as we’ve probably mentioned a couple of times.  This necessitated sending multiple mailings of both county and state guides to ensure that voters received information about the ballot as soon as possible.

The total number of registered voters that received state guides during our supplemental mailings was 28,238. Some  costs associated with the publishing and issuing of guides to voters who register after the first issues are mailed are reimbursable. Curious about what’s reimburseable and what’s not? Visit the SOS website at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ccrov/pdf/2008/november/08319km.pdf.

Categories: Ballots · Campaigns/Political parties · Elections Office · Voter registration
Tagged: , , , ,

Election Potpourri

June 4, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The Blog

We started this blog to give you an inside look at Elections in San Mateo County. We weren’t sure how popular it would be, but if our blog stats are any indication, you like it!

The past two days have seen a surge in blog traffic, with over 3,000 visitors checking out what we have to say. Thank you for supporting our effort to engage the community in our democracy.

And remember, comments on posts are encouraged – ask questions, raise concerns, offer praise. You can even subscribe to an RSS feed to get the latest posts delivered straight to your desktop.

Semi-Official Results for the June 3 Statewide Direct Primary

If you haven’t visited RaceTracker yet, click here to check out the semi-official results for the June 3 Statewide Direct Primary Election.

There’s some great information to be taken from the semi-official report (other than the results), such as statistics indicating how many voters voted by mail vs. at the polling places.

According to our reports, turnout was dismal. Only 19.74 percent of registered voters chose to vote this election. On the bright side? Over 57 percent of voters who voted did so by mail!

For a reminder on how voting by mail can help save money, check out the blog post from April 14.

And don’t forget, we still have more results to publish. The reason the current report is called the “Semi-Official Results” is because voters who dropped of Vote by Mail ballots at the polls, and voters who voted provisionally, still need to be counted. Those votes take longer because signatures have to be verified.

That being said, more results are on their way. You can click here to view our RaceTracker. Keep tabs on the races you want to track or view the overall election summary. Results should be published in accordance with the schedule below (times are approximate). Keep a look out for any updates to this schedule by visiting the Elections Office web site at www.shapethefuture.org.

Wed., June 4 – 4:30 p.m.
Fri., June 6 – 4:30 p.m.
Mon., June 9 – 4:30 p.m.

The Canvass

Still counting Vote By Mail ballots during the Official Canvass of the Vote

An elections process favored by Chief Elections Officer Warren Slocum, he has said “The canvass is the least understood, most important part of the elections process.”

The canvass is actually a 28-day period following the election in which vote tallies are completed and ballots and votes are reconciled. A manual tally of at least one percent of the votes cast in each race verifies that votes cast by voters are correctly reflected in results reports.

Election Day has come and gone, but until all the votes are counted and an audit is done, the Election itself is far from over.

Presidential Primary Pricetag

When the State Legislature added the February Presidential Primary this year, the price of democracy went up by about $2 million dollars in San Mateo County alone. Primaries are much more expensive elections to conduct because of the complexities associated with creating the extra ballots styles and voter information pamphlets, the testing involved with the voting equipment, the extra training for poll workers who are assisting partisan and decline-to-state voters, and on and on and on…The State Senate is holding a hearing this morning to decide whether and if counties will be held harmless for all or part of the election costs associated with the conduct of the 2008 Presidential Primary. Stay tuned.

UPDATE: We just got word that the Senate Budget & Fiscal Committee set aside the money to reimburse counties for the 2008 Presidential Primary Election.  While this is great news, we do have to wait until the final budget is approved to determine whether or not the state’s commitment remains intact.  For now, we’re hopeful.

Categories: Ballots · Election Day/Night · Elections Office · Poll workers · Polling place · Results · Signature verification · Vote By Mail · Vote counting · Voting · Web Stuff We Like
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

Goodbye April, Hello May

April 14, 2008 · Leave a Comment

PVESD STF BannerThe dust is barely settling from the April 4 Special Congressional Open Primary Election and yet the deadline to register to vote for the May 6 Portola Valley Elementary School District All-Mail Election already looms near.

The Portola Valley Elementary School District Election is being conducted to fill the vacant seat on the governing board. The certified list of candidates appearing on the May 6 ballot can be found on the San Mateo County Elections website in the box dedicated to the May 6 Portola Valley Elementary School District Election.

When we said this was going to be a busy election year, we weren’t kidding! Early voting began on April 7, one day before the April 8 Special Congressional Open Primary Election. But at least this election is an all-mail election, which will protect the Portola Valley Elementary School District from the ginormous bill like the one associated with the April 8 election with which San Mateo County got stuck.

How ginormous, you ask?

Only 17,595 voters in San Mateo County’s portion of the 12th Congressional District bothered to vote at the polls at a cost of $26.70 per voter. With a total turnout of 25.9 percent, at least we can take a little comfort in the fact that the other 73 percent of voters who turned in a ballot chose to vote by mail. That decision saved about $15.10 per voter.

(more…)

Categories: Ballots · Election Day/Night · Elections Office · Poll workers · Polling place · Results · Vote By Mail · Vote counting · Voting
Tagged: , , , , ,